Dyscinetus sp. ?

idem pour celui ci piege lumineux a roura
[url]
seb

Edéage? Mais il me semble que c'est une femelle....

Stéphane

Dyscinetus sp?

Yannig

This can be Dyscinetus olivaceus (Burmeister, 1847) for the color greenish, but also it is seemed to Dyscinetus dubius (Olivier 1789) (both species common) but D. dubius is blacker. To be sure it is necessary to look the clipeo: is it punctate? or rugoso?.
On the other hand, the clipeus Is emarginated in D. dubius and not emarginated in D. olivaceus. Also in D. dubius the head in the frons is 4 times the width of an eye seen from above and in D. olivaceus it is 3 times the width of an eye seen from above. May be that this information serves you?.
Greetings
Carlos

This can be Dyscinetus olivaceus (Burmeister, 1847) for the color greenish, but also it is seemed to Dyscinetus dubius (Olivier 1789) (both species common) but D. dubius is blacker. To be sure it is necessary to look the clipeo: is it punctate? or rugoso?.
On the other hand, the clipeus Is emarginated in D. dubius and not emarginated in D. olivaceus. Also in D. dubius the head in the frons is 4 times the width of an eye seen from above and in D. olivaceus it is 3 times the width of an eye seen from above. May be that this information serves you?.
Greetings
Carlos

This can be Dyscinetus olivaceus (Burmeister, 1847) for the color greenish, but also it is seemed to Dyscinetus dubius (Olivier 1789) (both species common) but D. dubius is blacker. To be sure it is necessary to look the clipeo: is it punctate? or rugoso?.
On the other hand, the clipeus Is emarginated in D. dubius and not emarginated in D. olivaceus. Also in D. dubius the head in the frons is 4 times the width of an eye seen from above and in D. olivaceus it is 3 times the width of an eye seen from above. May be that this information serves you?.
Greetings
Carlos